Are record-setting stocks signaling a market too rich for its own good, or is this just the beginning of their value journey?
The S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average have hit multiple record highs at the beginning of 2024.
Investors are debating the current valuation of stocks using various financial models.
Valuation models used include the price/earnings ratio, price-to-book ratio, equity risk premium, PEG ratio, and CAPE ratio.
Investors are navigating a perennial debate as stocks like the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average soar to new heights. With the S&P 500 marking its 10th record of the year and the Dow setting 11 records, questions arise: are stocks too expensive or is their growth justifiable?
When determining if a stock or index is undervalued or overvalued, investors often rely on a variety of metrics. These include the price/earnings ratio, which compares a company’s stock price to its per-share earnings, offering insight into what investors are paying for each dollar of earnings. While a rising earnings trend can fuel sustained stock price gains, an imbalance where stock prices outpace earnings growth can signal an overinflated market.
The S&P 500’s price/earnings ratio, based on trailing earnings, stands at 24.18 – above the ten-year average. This suggests that stocks might be pricey at current levels. As technology companies often tout higher multiples due to anticipated future profits, their valuations become even more critical to examine. Nvidia, for instance, trades at a multiple that, while lofty, some investors see as reasonable given its projected growth.
Another method, the price-to-book ratio, measures stock prices against a company’s book value, often used by those hunting for undervalued opportunities. However, this ratio may not adequately reflect the growth potential for tech companies, whose assets are not as tangible. The forward price-to-book ratio of the S&P 500 exceeds both its 10-year and 20-year averages, signaling that stocks might be expensive compared to historical norms.
The equity risk premium compares the expected earnings yield of equities to the yield of government bonds. Currently, the S&P 500’s equity risk premium is near a two-decade low, potentially indicating overvaluation.
The PEG ratio takes this further by comparing the price/earnings ratio to the company’s projected earnings growth. While the current PEG for the S&P 500 sits below its 10-year average, it’s above the 20-year average, presenting a mixed view on valuation.
Finally, the CAPE ratio, developed by Nobel Laureate Robert Shiller, adjusts for economic cycles by comparing current prices to average inflation-adjusted earnings over the past decade. The S&P 500’s current CAPE ratio is significantly above the historical norm, yet below the extremes seen during the tech bubble and before the pandemic.
Investors weighing stock valuations must consider these models within the broader context of economic conditions, corporate health, and industry performance. While metrics suggest caution due to higher valuations, the potential for earnings growth could justify current prices, particularly for tech stocks. As such, investors remain at a crossroads, balancing the fear of missing out on growth against the risk of entering a bubble.
What’s your take on this? Let’s know about your thoughts in the comments below!